豆瓣英文电影

‘壹’ 英文电影中文影评

无论你喜欢变形金刚与否，今年最大的娱乐大片，非此莫属。观乎电影现在的规模，电脑特效、数码3D、IMAX等等，已是倾全力来吸引观众入场，话题性（炸毁香港！）十足，兼且连场动作至超长的157分钟，无论观众喜欢与否，都难以拒绝。这开场白，我已用了两趟“无论喜欢与否”了，你就明白我喜欢与否了。
故事的内容似通非通，狂派博派的恩恩怨怨搞到糊里糊涂，火花抓狂而四处捣乱，还有无厘头的父女准女婿情，全球走景，由美国德州走到长城、重庆而南下香港，噱头处处，还有多得连性格都无时间刻划的狂派、博派和A货狂派杀手。最后还要泡制近乎世界末日式大战，回外太空寻找造物主云云。
迈克尔·贝确是匠心独运，他明白到娱乐大片的唯一生存法则：斗大，大得你无法反驳，大得你无暇兼顾，大得无论多突兀都变成顺理成章。
这戏开始自狂派与博派展开黑月之战后，芝加哥几乎被夷为平地，汽车工程师Cade（马克·沃尔伯格饰）无意中找到柯柏文开始，便跟少艾十七岁女儿Tessa（妮可拉·佩尔茨饰）一直不咬弦，直至戏的终结才迷途知返，明白老爹爱之伟大。这已是全部人物线索，剩下的连场火爆动作，不明所以地来到东南亚。
马克·沃尔伯格的角色设定，是单亲爸爸兼具工程专业知识，兼且一穷二白，郁郁不得志，靠辅助变形金刚打怪物，重振父亲的威信。这设计无疑针对较成熟的男性观众，比前三集舒拉保夫主演的青春片定位“成熟”了，但不代表人生智慧随年渐长。倒是，它是不折不扣的动作片，马克·沃尔伯格的扎实动作男星形像大派用场，而更重要是，戏的首三分一，全是以美国西部为背景，它的西部片意图便昭然若揭了（包括整了含着雪茄，身上缠满弹药的博派机械人），它让人想起《豪勇七蛟龙》（马克·沃尔伯格父女和准女婿三人，再加四个博派），显见下过心思。
其他的电影参考，还有如《末来战士》的歼灭者机械人，他是本集的头号大敌，与人类联手，将博派置诸死地，灿烂、夺目、有型。可惜，他跟其他机械人的连场恶斗，都不能增加观众都这三方面机械人的认知。
值得留意是，迈克尔·贝愈来愈擅长引入小点子：具磁力的太空船、蛰伏多年的外星恐龙、令人变为金属的大杀伤力武器等等，但就无视它们的全无连贯性，意念虽多却未曾细致统一，有时更有应接不暇自相矛盾之叹。
它是典型21世纪的爆谷电影，总之目不暇给，热闹缤纷就算。长期摄取这种爆谷电影，观众会慢慢被训练，不求甚解地接受它的零碎、矛盾、辞不达意、过度活跃、节奏狂乱、戏味平淡、人物浮夸、特效独大等等…吃爆谷太多，变成超重一族，要抽脂减重恐怕代价高昂了！当坏品味凌驾一切，长年累月，它要歼灭的，其实是电影这创意媒体本身，还有空间让尊重观众智慧的电影出现吗？
说到底，《变形金刚4》是计算精确的大生意，朝着全球人口最多、最大巿场进发，香港只是众多中国城巿的showcase，香港取景部分：鲗鱼涌、深水埗、中银总行、会议展览中心、政总等等，炸毁她，正好让内地观众发泄一下对香港这城巿的复杂情绪。观众的期望和反应是预计之内，没有失望，亦不见得特别精采，这就是迈克尔·贝的功力，观众愈捧场，票房创新高，这种变形金刚歼灭战，以后仍会不断上演。

上www.yp136.com包你满意。
求采纳。

‘贰’ 适合写影评的英文电影（推荐5个吧）

推荐电影复仇者联盟，和恐怖电影死神来了，都是大片，最近有一部电影也很不错，推荐你看，名叫无名之辈，好看的不得了。
该片围绕一把丢失的老枪，讲述了一对低配版的劫匪，一个落魄的保安，一个身体残疾却性格彪悍的毒舌女，这些“无名之辈”身上发生的一系列荒诞故事。
总之是一部优秀电影。

‘叁’ 介绍几个关于电影的英文网站像豆瓣一样的

不用几个，一个IMDB就够：
http://us.imdb.com/

‘肆’ 求经典外国电影影评---要英文版本的

珍珠港的影评

pearl harbour film review

Pearl Harbor consists of three incongruous acts, mashed together into an ungainly whole. It appears to be more interested in reprocing the success of Titanic, which also set a fictional love story amidst a tragic historical event, than it is in telling the story of the men and women who fought and died in the attack on Pearl Harbor.
Titanic worked because the central characters were interesting, the story was cohesive, the historical events were handled respectfully and with the proper dramatic tone, and underneath it all was an intelligent reflection on the human failings that permitted such a tragedy in the first place.

Pearl Harbor reces the historical backdrop into a series of action set pieces. Instead of exploring ideas inherent in the events, it extracts them, recing the reason for Japan's attack to something inexplicable at best, and having utterly nothing to say about why the attack happened, how it was carried out, or how we responded. The film is dedicated to the men who died at Pearl Harbor, but what does it dedicate to them? It does not seem very interested in them except as a tool for dramatic imagery. Consider, for example, a scene in which we learn that men are trapped in a sunken ship in the harbor. We learn this to emphasize the brutality of the attack, as if such emphasis were needed. Then the film forgets this point entirely, providing the fates of those men in a narrated line just before the closing credits. Why wasn't the third act of the film about those men, instead of a rushed covering of the Doolittle raid on Tokyo, complete with overblown crash landings and an improbable engagement with Japanese soldiers?

If you want to see a real movie about Pearl Harbor or the Doolittle Raid, one that paints a deep and accurate picture of what it was like, one you can learn from, one that pays tribute to our veterans, or even just one that functions as convincing entertainment, there is no shortage of options. Tora! Tora! Tora! chronicles the events before, ring, and after the attack from both the American and Japanese sides. Thirty Seconds Over Tokyo is as thorough a chronicle of the Doolittle Raid as is probably possible in a feature film, while also following the personal stories of a few indivials involved (any one of which is more interesting than the personal story in Pearl Harbor). The Purple Heart, one of the most heartbreaking movies I've ever seen, tells the story of Americans captured by the Japanese after the raid.

Writing off the historical aspects of the film, I am left with the love triangle that makes up the entire first act and pervades the rest of it. It is wholly uninteresting. This same story has been told better, countless times before. Not one of the three characters is fleshed out into an indivial: they are bland stereotypes, dolled up to look pretty and given trite lines that they recite to convey the illusion of genuine emotion. It's telling that it doesn't much matter to us how the love triangle is resolved. Unless they both die, she'll get one of them, and who cares which? Neither of the men are personable, and we surely suspect early on that her decision will be based more on fate than her own volition anyway. (In plots like this, it's survival of the survivors.) And so, alas, we are denied even the most basic of all elements of storytelling, namely, characters making actual decisions

‘伍’ 英文电影影评

Julie & Julia is a 2009 American comedy-drama film written and directed by Nora Ephron starring Meryl Streep, Stanley Tucci, Amy Adams, and Chris Messina. The film contrasts the life of chef Julia Child in the early years of her culinary career with the life of young New Yorker Julie Powell, who aspires to cook all 524 recipes in Child's cookbook in 365 days, a challenge she described on her popular blog that would make her a published author.

Ephron's screenplay is adapted from two books: My Life in France, Child's autobiography written with Alex Prud'homme, and a memoir by Julie Powell documenting online her daily experiences cooking each of the 524 recipes in Child's Mastering the Art of French Cooking, and she later began reworking that blog, The Julie/Julia Project。 Both of these books were written and published in the same time frame (2004–06). The film is the first major motion picture based on a blog。这是我最喜欢的一部电影之一，我在维基网络上找的资料，你根据那里的资料改一改，至于观点，你可以写坚持自己的兴趣和爱好这一方面，写兴趣是最好的老师什么的，给你个链接

‘陆’ 推荐几部容易写英文影评的近期英文电影

《阿甘正传》——汤姆汉克斯

《我是传奇》——威尔史密斯

《当幸福来敲门》——威尔史密斯

我只推荐三个最好的，多了就不精了，

‘柒’ 求2部英文电影的英文影评！！

这个杀手不太冷

Luc Besson got the idea of doing this movie while working on his previous movie, Nikita (1990). In that film's third act, Victor the Cleaner (Jean Reno) appears to clean up the mess of Nikita's mission gone wrong. Realizing the potential of the character was underused in that movie, he decided to bring up a story that exploits the full characteristics of a "cleaner". A common element between Victor and Leon is that both men appears in the form of a long wool coat, sunglasses and a cap. Coincidentally, the film's original title was called ‘The Cleaner’. 
吕克·贝松在拍摄他的上一部电影《尼基塔》（Nikita）时就想要制作本片了。在那部电影的第三个镜头，清洁工维克多（让·雷诺）清扫尼基塔的垃圾时出了问题。导演意识到在《尼基塔》这部电影里，这个清洁工角色的性格特点并没有得到充分的发挥，所以他决定另外写一个故事，充分挖掘出这个清洁工的性格特点来。在维克多和莱昂之间有一个很平常的共同点，那就是这两个人都穿着长款羊毛外套，戴着墨镜和帽子。本片起初被命名为《清洁工》。

====================================================

魔戒

Facts and numbers about the trilogy: Over 6 million feet of film shot ring proction; 48,000 swords, axes, shields, and makeup prosthetics; 20,602 background actors cast; 19,000 costumes made by the wardrobe department; 10,000 crowd participants at New Zealand cricket game who made orc army grunts; 2,400 behind-the-scenes crew members at height of proction; 1,600 pairs or prosthetic hobbit feet created; 250 horses used in one scene; 180 computer special-effects artists employed; 114 total speaking roles; 100 real locations in New Zealand used for backdrops; 50 tailors, cobblers, designers and others in wardrobe department; 30 actors trained to speak fictional dialects and languages; 7 total years of development for all three movies.
有关三部曲的一些数字：用了6百万英尺以上的胶片；剑、斧头、盾牌以及化妆用假体共用48000个；20602名临时演员；服装部门做了19000套戏服；新西兰1万名群众帮忙录制了半兽人震天动地的声音；高峰时期剧组有2400名幕后工作者；做了1600对哈比人的假脚；一个场景中用250匹马；雇用了180名计算机特效艺术师；总共有114名说话的角色；用到了新西兰100处场所；服装部门的裁缝、鞋匠、设计师以及其他人员共50人；训练30个演员说方言以及其他语言；三部曲的完成总共花了7年时间。

‘捌’ 知道中文名如何在豆瓣找电影英文名

豆瓣里直接搜索中文名称也可以，或是网络中找到这部电影，复制里面的英文名到豆瓣

望采纳

‘玖’ ！！！！急求英语电影的英语影评

简爱
Kent
State
University's
school
of
theatre
and
dance
performed
a
rendition
of
the
classic,
Jane
Eyre
this
month.
The
show
was
a
musical
with
all
of
the
necessary
elements
to
lift
you
from
your
seat
and
submerse
youinto
a
society
in
nineteenth
century
England
from
the
time
the
cell
phone
shut-off
announcement
was
made
until
the
last
note
at
the
curtain
call.
The
recurring
arches,
darkened,
soft
lighting,
and
the
use
of
a
classic
chorus
to
go
along
with
them
alluded
that
a
sinister
underbelly
of
social
status
and
reputation
were
present
in
the
performance.
One
of
the
first
things
that
an
audience
member
noticed
was
the
grandeur
of
the
set.
It
was
composed
of
a
gothic-style
foreground
with
rustic
twigs
of
a
root-like
earthy
appearance.
There
were
grand
arches
for
windows
and
entries
as
well.
Also,
the
background
was
a
large
arch
with
the
silhouette
of
roots.
There
were
also
two
matching
greek-style
pillar
arches
on
either
side
of
the
stage.
They
added
a
lot
to
many
messages
of
the
show.
For
one,
they
were
grand
structures
that
were
barren
inside
which
is
much
like
Mr.
Rochester
himself.
He
was
a
man
of
high
social
stature
but
felt
enslaved
by
his
trick
of
a
marriage
and
his
grand
yet
incomplete
(without
a
true
love)
home.
The
arches
also
suggest
the
importance
of
reputation
with
the
same
sort
of
fundamental
grand
image
yet
emptiness.
The
way
that
people
are
enslaved
yet
scramble
to
ascertain
that
solid
image
amongst
their
peers.
The
arches
were
almost
inviting
the
audience
to
come
inside
to
reveal
their
secret,
the
thing
that
was
hidden
deep
inside
that
could
send
the
structure
crumbling
in
ruin.

‘拾’ 如何在豆瓣上找电影的英文名

豆瓣电影介绍 片长 下面一行 “又名”：都有英文名
例如 导演: Baran bo Odar
编剧: Jantje Friese / Baran bo Odar
主演: 汤姆·希林 / 埃利亚斯·穆巴里克 / 沃坦·维尔克·默林
类型: 惊悚
制片国家/地区: 德国
语言: 德语
上映日期: 2014-09-25
片长: 105分钟
又名: Who Am I - No System Is Safe